RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"Complementation of function after coexpression of pairs of nonfunctional G protein-coupled receptors that contain distinct inactivating mutations supports the hypothesis that such receptors exist as dimers. Chimeras between members of the metabotropic glutamate receptor-like family have been particularly useful because the N-terminal ligand binding and heptahelical transmembrane elements can be considered distinct domains. To examine the utility of a related approach for opioid receptors, fusion proteins were generated in which a pertussis toxin-resistant (Cys351Ile) variant of the G protein Gi1alpha was linked to the C-terminal tails of the delta opioid peptide (DOP), kappa opioid peptide, and mu opioid peptide receptors. Each was functional as measured by agonist stimulation of guanosine 5'-([gamma-35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding in Gialpha immunoprecipitates from membranes of pertussis toxin-treated HEK293 cells. Agonist function was eliminated either by fusion of the receptors to Gi1alphaGly202Ala,Cys351Ile or mutation of a pair of conserved Val residues in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor. Coexpression, but not simple mixing, of the two inactive fusion proteins reconstituted agonist-loading of [35S]GTPgammaS for each receptor. At equimolar amounts, reconstitution of DOP receptor function was more extensive than kappa or mu opioid receptor. Reconstitution of DOP function required two intact receptors and was not achieved by provision of extra Gi1alphaCys351Ile membrane anchored by linkage to DOP transmembrane domain 1. Inactive forms of all G protein alpha subunits can be produced by mutations equivalent to Gi1alphaGly202Ala. Because the amino acids modified in the opioid receptors are highly conserved in most rhodopsin-like receptors, this approach should be widely applicable to study the existence and molecular basis of receptor dimerization."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1124/mol.105.013847"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1124/mol.105.013847"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Pascal G."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Pascal G."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Milligan G."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Milligan G."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2005"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2005"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Mol. Pharmacol."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Mol. Pharmacol."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"905-915"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"905-915"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Functional complementation and the analysis of opioid receptor homodimerization."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Functional complementation and the analysis of opioid receptor homodimerization."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"68"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"68"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/15967873
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/15967873
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15967873
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15967873
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P35372http://purl.uniprot.org/core/citationhttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/P35372#attribution-FFE91D2DB46409155D1B4995E2B95406http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/15967873