RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"Comparative genomic approaches to gene and cis-regulatory prediction are based on the principle that differential DNA sequence conservation reflects variation in functional constraint. Using this principle, we analyze noncoding sequence conservation in Drosophila for 40 loci with known or suspected cis-regulatory function encompassing >100 kb of DNA. We estimate the fraction of noncoding DNA conserved in both intergenic and intronic regions and describe the length distribution of ungapped conserved noncoding blocks. On average, 22%-26% of noncoding sequences surveyed are conserved in Drosophila, with median block length approximately 19 bp. We show that point substitution in conserved noncoding blocks exhibits transition bias as well as lineage effects in base composition, and occurs more than an order of magnitude more frequently than insertion/deletion (indel) substitution. Overall, patterns of noncoding DNA structure and evolution differ remarkably little between intergenic and intronic conserved blocks, suggesting that the effects of transcription per se contribute minimally to the constraints operating on these sequences. The results of this study have implications for the development of alignment and prediction algorithms specific to noncoding DNA, as well as for models of cis-regulatory DNA sequence evolution."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1101/gr.178701"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Kreitman M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Bergman C.M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2001"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Genome Res"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"1335-1345"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"11"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4KFI1-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4KFY1-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4KEP4-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4K6Q6-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P14003-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4KGX3-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4KH05-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4LHB3-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4LHS1-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0B4LI86-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A6M3Q705-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A6M3Q797-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A6M3Q823-mappedCitation-11483574http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/11483574