RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Background

Systematic analyses of loss-of-function phenotypes have been carried out for most genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster. Although such studies vastly expand our knowledge of single gene function, they do not address redundancy in genetic networks. Developing tools for the systematic mapping of genetic interactions is thus a key step in exploring the relationship between genotype and phenotype.

Results

We established conditions for RNA interference (RNAi) in C. elegans to target multiple genes simultaneously in a high-throughput setting. Using this approach, we can detect the great majority of previously known synthetic genetic interactions. We used this assay to examine the redundancy of duplicated genes in the genome of C. elegans that correspond to single orthologs in S. cerevisiae or D. melanogaster and identified 16 pairs of duplicated genes that have redundant functions. Remarkably, 14 of these redundant gene pairs were duplicated before the divergence of C. elegans and C. briggsae 80-110 million years ago, suggesting that there has been selective pressure to maintain the overlap in function between some gene duplicates.

Conclusion

We established a high throughput method for examining genetic interactions using combinatorial RNAi in C. elegans. Using this technique, we demonstrated that many duplicated genes can retain redundant functions for more than 80 million years of evolution. This provides strong support for evolutionary models that predict that genetic redundancy between duplicated genes can be actively maintained by natural selection and is not just a transient side effect of recent gene duplication events."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-8-r69"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Chen N."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Fraser A.G."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Lehner B."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Tischler J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2006"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Genome Biol"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"R69"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Combinatorial RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that redundancy between gene duplicates can be maintained for more than 80 million years of evolution."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"7"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AUG2-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AUG7-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AUH3-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AUI8-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AWS4-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AWS8-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AWT1-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0K3AWU4-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A078BPE0-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A078BPF6-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A078BQI3-mappedCitation-16884526http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/16884526