Results

RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare ▶
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Background

Cullin-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligases (CDL) are key regulators of protein destruction that participate in a wide range of cell biological processes. The Roc subunit of CDL contains an evolutionarily conserved RING domain that binds ubiquitin charged E2 and is essential for ubiquitylation. Drosophila melanogaster contains three highly related Roc proteins: Roc1a and Roc2, which are conserved in vertebrates, and Roc1b, which is specific to Drosophila. Our previous genetic data analyzing Roc1a and Roc1b mutants suggested that Roc proteins are functionally distinct, but the molecular basis for this distinction is not known.

Methodology/principal findings

Using co-immunoprecipitation studies we show that Drosophila Roc proteins bind specific Cullins: Roc1a binds Cul1-4, Roc1b binds Cul3, and Roc2 binds Cul5. Through domain swapping experiments, we demonstrate that Cullin binding specificity is strongly influenced by the Roc NH(2)-terminal domain, which forms an inter-molecular beta sheet with the Cullin. Substitution of the Roc1a RING domain with that of Roc1b results in a protein with similar Cullin binding properties to Roc1a that is active as an E3 ligase but cannot complement Roc1a mutant lethality, indicating that the identity of the RING domain can be an important determinant of CDL function. In contrast, the converse chimeric protein with a substitution of the Roc1b RING domain with that of Roc1a can rescue the male sterility of Roc1b mutants, but only when expressed from the endogenous Roc1b promoter. We also identified mutations of Roc2 and Cul5 and show that they cause no overt developmental phenotype, consistent with our finding that Roc2 and Cul5 proteins are exclusive binding partners, which others have observed in human cells as well.

Conclusions

The Drosophila Roc proteins are highly similar, but have diverged during evolution to bind a distinct set of Cullins and to utilize RING domains that have overlapping, but not identical, function in vivo."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002918"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Duronio R.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Reynolds P.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Simms J.R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2008"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"PLoS One"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"e2918"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Identifying determinants of cullin binding specificity among the three functionally different Drosophila melanogaster Roc proteins via domain swapping."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"3"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q24311#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q24311#attribution-EE616D9DDF6904D9C8EB68655FF97C70http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9NHX0#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9NHX0#attribution-EE616D9DDF6904D9C8EB68655FF97C70http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9W5E1#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9W5E1#attribution-EE616D9DDF6904D9C8EB68655FF97C70http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q5BI50#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q5BI50#attribution-EE616D9DDF6904D9C8EB68655FF97C70http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9VAQ0#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9VAQ0#attribution-89FC7953415A1302D886295DDB9C3F11http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9VAQ0#attribution-EE616D9DDF6904D9C8EB68655FF97C70http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9V9R2#attribution-0565B869218B30916D43C4E6B3DEADF1http://purl.uniprot.org/core/sourcehttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18698375
▶