RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Objective

To investigate the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in p21 and p27 genes with the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

Genotypes were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction-restrictive fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method in 234 patients with EOC and 284 control women in China.

Results

(1) The frequencies of the p21 in healthy controls were 34.2%, 49.6% and 16.2%, while the distribution of the C and T allele was 59.0% and 41.0%, respectively. The p21 C/C (28.2%), C/T (53.0%), T/T (18.8%) distribution in ovarian cancer patients was not significantly different from that in healthy controls (P > 0.05). There was no statistic difference in allele distribution between ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls (P > 0.05) either. The stratification analysis by tumor histological type did show that the genotype distribution in four types of ovarian cancer patients was significantly different from that in healthy controls (P = 0.02) . The C/C genotype was likely to reduce the risk of epithelial endometrial cancer, and the adjusted odds ratio was 0.56 (95% CI:0.32-0.98). (2) The genotype frequencies of the p27 in healthy controls were 88.4%, 10.9% and 0.7%, while the distribution of the V and G allele was 93.8% and 6.2%, respectively. The V/V (93.6%), V/G (5.1%) and G/G (1.3%) distribution in ovarian cancer patients was significantly different from that in healthy controls (P = 0. 04). There was no statistic difference in allele distribution between ovarian cancer patients and healthy controls (P > 0.05). Compared with the V/G and G/G genotypes, the V/V genotype increased the risk of EOC, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.92 (95% CI: 1.02-3.63).

Conclusion

The C/C genotype of p21 may reduce the risk of epithelial endometrial cancer, and the genotype of p27 V/V may be a potential risk factor for susceptibility to EOC."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Kang S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Li Y."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Wang N."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Jin X."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Xing Y.P."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2008"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"209-212"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"[Single nucleotide polymorphisms in cell cycle regulator p21 and p27 genes are associated with susceptibility to epithelial ovarian cancer]."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"43"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B4DQP9-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A7KMP4-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B4DPH2-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P38936-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_O43806-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q59ED0-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P46527-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q708J1-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q6I9V6-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q96TE0-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q9NYG6-mappedCitation-18788572http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/18788572