RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Background

The function of BRCA1 in response to ionizing radiation, which directly generates DNA double strand breaks, has been extensively characterized. However previous investigations have produced conflicting data on mutagens that initially induce other classes of DNA adducts. Because of the fundamental and clinical importance of understanding BRCA1 function, we sought to rigorously evaluate the role of this tumor suppressor in response to diverse forms of genotoxic stress.

Methodology/principal findings

We investigated BRCA1 stability and localization in various human cells treated with model mutagens that trigger different DNA damage signaling pathways. We established that, unlike ionizing radiation, either UVC or methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) (generating bulky DNA adducts or alkylated bases respectively) induces a transient downregulation of BRCA1 protein which is neither prevented nor enhanced by inhibition of PIKKs. Moreover, we found that the proteasome mediates early degradation of BRCA1, BARD1, BACH1, and Rad52 implying that critical components of the homologous recombination machinery need to be functionally abrogated as part of the early response to UV or MMS. Significantly, we found that inhibition of BRCA1/BARD1 downregulation is accompanied by the unscheduled recruitment of both proteins to chromatin along with Rad51. Consistently, treatment of cells with MMS engendered complete disassembly of Rad51 from pre-formed ionizing radiation-induced foci. Following the initial phase of BRCA1/BARD1 downregulation, we found that the recovery of these proteins in foci coincides with the formation of RPA and Rad51 foci. This indicates that homologous recombination is reactivated at later stage of the cellular response to MMS, most likely to repair DSBs generated by replication blocks.

Conclusion/significance

Taken together our results demonstrate that (i) the stabilities of BRCA1/BARD1 complexes are regulated in a mutagen-specific manner, and (ii) indicate the existence of mechanisms that may be required to prevent the simultaneous recruitment of conflicting signaling pathways to sites of DNA damage."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014027"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Yu H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Drobetsky E.A."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Parvin J.D."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Hammond-Martel I."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Pak H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Affar e.l. B."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Horwitz A.A."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Rouget R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2010"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"PLoS One"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"e14027"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"PI 3 kinase related kinases-independent proteolysis of BRCA1 regulates Rad51 recruitment during genotoxic stress in human cells."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"5"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A087WZ19-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0AVN2-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B2RAM8-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B4DX74-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B4DZT8-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_C9IYG1-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q53F80-mappedCitation-21103343http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/21103343