RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"The recently identified TMEM16/anoctamin protein family includes Ca(2+)-activated anion channels (TMEM16A, TMEM16B), a cation channel (TMEM16F) and proteins with unclear function. TMEM16 channels consist of eight putative transmembrane domains (TMs) with TM5-TM6 flanking a re-entrant loop thought to form the pore. In TMEM16A this region has also been suggested to contain residues involved in Ca(2+) binding. The role of the putative pore-loop of TMEM16 channels was investigated using a chimeric approach. Heterologous expression of either TMEM16A or TMEM16B resulted in whole-cell anion currents with very similar conduction properties but distinct kinetics and degrees of sensitivity to Ca(2+). Furthermore, whole-cell currents mediated by TMEM16A channels were ∼six times larger than TMEM16B-mediated currents. Replacement of the putative pore-loop of TMEM16A with that of TMEM16B (TMEM16A-B channels) reduced the currents by ∼six-fold, while the opposite modification (TMEM16B-A channels) produced a ∼six-fold increase in the currents. Unexpectedly, these changes were not secondary to variations in channel gating by Ca(2+) or voltage, nor were they due to changes in single-channel conductance. Instead, they depended on the number of functional channels present on the plasma membrane. Generation of additional, smaller chimeras within the putative pore-loop of TMEM16A and TMEM16B led to the identification of a region containing a non-canonical trafficking motif. Chimeras composed of the putative pore-loop of TMEM16F transplanted into the TMEM16A protein scaffold did not conduct anions or cations. These data suggest that the putative pore-loop does not form a complete, transferable pore domain. Furthermore, our data reveal an unexpected role for the putative pore-loop of TMEM16A and TMEM16B channels in the control of the whole-cell Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) conductance."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2013.251660"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Smith K.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Tammaro P."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Adomaviciene A."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Garnett H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2013"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"J Physiol"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"3487-3505"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Putative pore-loops of TMEM16/anoctamin channels affect channel density in cell membranes."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"591"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0A0MQF2-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_D3YYA4-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_E0CZF2-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A5F8MPM2-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A2I3BPX3-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A2I3BPY8-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A2I3BRD2-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A348BSL7-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_F6UR69-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_D3Z035-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_G8JL82-mappedCitation-23613533http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23613533