RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"Post-oral sugar actions enhance the intake of and preference for sugar-rich foods, a process referred to as appetition. Here, we investigated the role of intestinal sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs) in sugar appetition in C57BL/6J mice using sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs that differ in their affinity for SGLT1 and SGLT3. In experiments 1 and 2, food-restricted mice were trained (1 h/day) to consume a flavored saccharin solution [conditioned stimulus (CS-)] paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of water and a different flavored solution (CS+) paired with infusions of 8 or 12% sugars (glucose, fructose, and galactose) or sugar analogs (α-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, MDG; 3-O-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, OMG). Subsequent two-bottle CS+ vs. CS-choice tests were conducted without coinfusions. Infusions of the SGLT1 ligands glucose, galactose, MDG, and OMG stimulated CS+ licking above CS-levels. However, only glucose, MDG, and galactose conditioned significant CS+ preferences, with the SGLT3 ligands (glucose, MDG) producing the strongest preferences. Fructose, which is not a ligand for SGLTs, failed to stimulate CS+ intake or preference. Experiment 3 revealed that IG infusion of MDG+phloridzin (an SGLT1/3 antagonist) blocked MDG appetition, whereas phloridzin had minimal effects on glucose-induced appetition. However, adding phloretin (a GLUT2 antagonist) to the glucose+phloridzin infusion blocked glucose appetition. Taken together, these findings suggest that humoral signals generated by intestinal SGLT1 and SGLT3, and to a lesser degree, GLUT2, mediate post-oral sugar appetition in mice. The MDG results indicate that sugar metabolism is not essential for the post-oral intake-stimulating and preference-conditioning actions of sugars in mice."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00297.2013"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Sclafani A."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Zukerman S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Ackroff K."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2013"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"R840-53"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"305"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0PJT9-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_E9PXR7-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_O70122-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q3UNC8-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P14246-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q2VPB3-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q8CCA7-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q9ET37-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q9CR07-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q9QXX5-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q8C3K6-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q91ZP4-mappedCitation-23926132http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/23926132