RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"Lowland rice (Nipponbare) and upland rice (Gaoshan 1) that are comparable under normal and moderate drought conditions showed dramatic differences in severe drought conditions, both naturally occurring long-term drought and simulated rapid water deficits. We focused on their root response and found that enhanced tolerance of upland rice to severe drought conditions was mainly due to the lower level of ABA in its roots than in those of the lowland rice. We first excluded the effect of ABA biosynthesis and catabolism on root-accumulated ABA levels in both types of rice by monitoring the expression of four OsNCED genes and two OsABA8ox genes. Next, we excluded the impact of the aerial parts on roots by suppressing leaf-biosynthesized ABA with fluridone and NDGA (nordihydroguaiaretic acid), and measuring the ABA level in detached roots. Instead, we proved that upland rice had the ability to export considerably more root-sourced ABA than lowland rice under severe drought, which improved ABA-dependent drought adaptation. The investigation of apoplastic pH in root cells and root anatomy showed that ABA leakage in the root system of upland rice was related to high apoplastic pH and the absence of Casparian bands in the sclerenchyma layer. Finally, taking some genes as examples, we predicted that different ABA levels in rice roots stimulated distinct ABA perception and signaling cascades, which influenced its response to water stress."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1093/pcp/pcv022"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1093/pcp/pcv022"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Guo M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Guo M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Liu Y."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Liu Y."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Cui S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Cui S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Liu R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Liu R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Zhang J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Zhang J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Xia Y."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Xia Y."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Ye N."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Ye N."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Shi L."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Shi L."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2015"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2015"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Plant Cell Physiol."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/25735958http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Plant Cell Physiol."xsd:string