RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Objective

How hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions in C9ORF72 cause amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains poorly understood. Both gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms have been proposed. Evidence supporting these mechanisms in vivo is, however, incomplete. Here we determined the effect of C9orf72 loss-of-function in mice.

Methods

We generated and analyzed a conditional C9orf72 knockout mouse model. C9orf72(fl/fl) mice were crossed with Nestin-Cre mice to selectively remove C9orf72 from neurons and glial cells. Immunohistochemistry was performed to study motor neurons and neuromuscular integrity, as well as several pathological hallmarks of ALS, such as gliosis and TDP-43 mislocalization. In addition, motor function and survival were assessed.

Results

Neural-specific ablation of C9orf72 in conditional C9orf72 knockout mice resulted in significantly reduced body weight but did not induce motor neuron degeneration, defects in motor function, or altered survival.

Interpretation

Our data suggest that C9orf72 loss-of-function, by itself, is insufficient to cause motor neuron disease. These results may have important implications for the development of therapeutic strategies for C9orf72-associated ALS."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1002/ana.24453"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1002/ana.24453"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Pasterkamp R.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Pasterkamp R.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Blake D.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Blake D.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Blokhuis A.M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Blokhuis A.M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Koppers M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Koppers M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Schellevis R.D."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Schellevis R.D."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Terpstra M.L."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Terpstra M.L."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Veldink J.H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Veldink J.H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Vieira de Sa R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Vieira de Sa R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Waite A.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Waite A.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Westeneng H.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/26044557http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Westeneng H.J."xsd:string