Results

RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare ▶
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Background

Whole genome next generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly employed to detect genomic rearrangements in cancer genomes, especially in lymphoid malignancies. We recently established a unique mouse model by specifically deleting a key non-homologous end-joining DNA repair gene, Xrcc4, and a cell cycle checkpoint gene, Trp53, in germinal center B cells. This mouse model spontaneously develops mature B cell lymphomas (termed G1XP lymphomas).

Results

Here, we attempt to employ whole genome NGS to identify novel structural rearrangements, in particular inter-chromosomal translocations (CTXs), in these G1XP lymphomas. We sequenced six lymphoma samples, aligned our NGS data with mouse reference genome (in C57BL/6J (B6) background) and identified CTXs using CREST algorithm. Surprisingly, we detected widespread CTXs in both lymphomas and wildtype control samples, majority of which were false positive and attributable to different genetic backgrounds. In addition, we validated our NGS pipeline by sequencing multiple control samples from distinct tissues of different genetic backgrounds of mouse (B6 vs non-B6). Lastly, our studies showed that widespread false positive CTXs can be generated by simply aligning sequences from different genetic backgrounds of mouse.

Conclusions

We conclude that mapping and alignment with reference genome might not be a preferred method for analyzing whole-genome NGS data obtained from a genetic background different from reference genome. Given the complex genetic background of different mouse strains or the heterogeneity of cancer genomes in human patients, in order to minimize such systematic artifacts and uncover novel CTXs, a preferred method might be de novo assembly of personalized normal control genome and cancer cell genome, instead of mapping and aligning NGS data to mouse or human reference genome. Thus, our studies have critical impact on the manner of data analysis for cancer genomics."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3153-9"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Chen Z."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Jones K."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Gao B."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Wang J.H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Mishra A.K."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Gowan K."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Diener K."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Leach S.M."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Viboolsittiseri S.S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Kadoishi T."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2016"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"BMC Genomics"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"823"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Unexpected effects of different genetic backgrounds on identification of genomic rearrangements via whole-genome next generation sequencing."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"17"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0A6YWR2-mappedCitation-27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A075B5P4-mappedCitation-27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_E0CY05-mappedCitation-27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_E0CZC8-mappedCitation-27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0J9YVI7-mappedCitation-27769169http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/27769169
▶