Results

RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare ▶
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Background

In breast cancer, BRCA promoter hypermethylation and BRCA germline mutations are said to occur together rarely, but this property has not yet been translated into a clinical test. Our aim in this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of BRCA1/2 methylation in distinguishing breast carcinomas of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation carriers from sporadic breast carcinomas using a recently developed BRCA methylation assay based on methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA).

Methods

MS-MLPAs were performed to assess BRCA1 and BRCA2 methylation in breast carcinoma tissues from 39 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 germline mutation carriers, 80 patients with sporadic breast cancer, and normal breast tissues from 5 BRCA1 and 4 BRCA2 mutation carriers and 5 nonmutation carriers.

Results

Methylation frequencies varied considerably between CpG sites across the BRCA1 and BRCA2 promoters. Some CpG sites were methylated more frequently in BRCA1/2-related than in sporadic carcinomas, whereas other CpG sites were methylated more frequently in sporadic carcinomas, with large variances in sensitivity and specificity as a consequence.

Conclusions

The diagnostic value of BRCA promoter methylation analysis in distinguishing BRCA1/2-related from sporadic breast carcinomas seems to be considerably dependent on the targeted CpG sites. These findings are important for adequate use of BRCA methylation analysis as a prescreening tool for BRCA germline genetic testing or to identify BRCAness patients who may benefit from targeted therapies such as poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0856-z"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Vos S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"van Diest P.J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Moelans C.B."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2017"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Breast Cancer Res"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"64"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"BRCA promoter methylation in sporadic versus BRCA germline mutation-related breast cancers."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"19"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0F6TMZ9-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0F6TN25-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0F6TN92-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BDS2-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BDS6-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BDT0-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BDU2-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BEU4-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BEV8-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BEW3-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BC92-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068BC94-mappedCitation-28569220http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28569220
▶