RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"The split specificities of HLA-B14 (B64, B65) are assigned to the B*14:01 (B64) and B*14:02 (B65) products only. Of the further 50 B*14 expressed products, only B*14:03 and B*14:06 are officially designated as HLA-B14. The B*14:08 product differs from B64 by a single amino acid substitution of W97R, while the B*14:53 specificity (which is a "short" B14 and neither B64 nor B65) differs from B64 by three residues (W97S, Y113H and F116Y). Comprehensive testing of B*14:08:01 cells (using 49 alloantisera with B64 or B64, B65 specificities, and five monoclonal antibodies with B65 or B64, B65 activity) showed that the B*14:08 specificity is, like the B*14:53 product, neither B64 nor B65 and appears as a "short" B14 specificity. To help understand the serological reactivity of the B*14:08 and B*14:53 products, and B64 and B65, we identified seven published epitopes (11AV, 97W, 61ICT, 116F, 131S+163T, 170RH and 420) and, by inspection, 29 motifs, that encompass one or more of B64, B65 and various HLA-B14 cross-reactive group specificities. We then considered the possession of these epitopes and motifs by the products of B*14:01 to B*14:06, B*14:08 and B*14:53. Seventeen of the 29 motifs fully complied with the one-/two-patch functional epitope concept for amino acid proximity, as determined by Cn3D software, the remainder partially complied. The nature and patterns of epitopes and motifs possessed by both B*14:08 and B*14:53 specificities supported their designation as HLA-B14 but non-B64/B65. Also that epitope 97W, with 11S or 11A, is critical for serological B64 and B65 reactivity. And conversely, that epitope 116F, and several identified motifs, are probably unimportant for HLA-B14 antibody reactivity. The previous submission that the B*14:03 specificity is HLA-B65 was compatible with its epitope/motif pattern. B*14:04 cells would also be expected to react as B65, based on its epitope/motif pattern, and not as B64 as previously implied. Also, from their epitope/motif patterns, and external serological information, it is probable that the B*14:05 and B*14:06 specificities will both appear as "short" HLA-B14, non-B64/B65. Several epitopes and motifs encompassed a range of HLA-B specificities included in the serological HLA-B14 cross-reactive group, thus supporting these original serological findings."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1111/iji.12328"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Darke C."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Street J."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2017"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Int J Immunogenet"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"225-233"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Epitopes and motifs of the HLA-B*14 allele family products and related HLA-B14 cross-reactive specificities."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"44"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0A7C552-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0E3DC98-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0E3DCA0-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A0E3DCA1-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B107-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B112-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B116-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B2J5-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B2Z1-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A068B6T8-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A089PAU6-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A076JYD5-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_A0A076N180-mappedCitation-28691368http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/28691368