Results

RDF/XMLNTriplesTurtleShow queryShare ▶
SubjectPredicateObject
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#typehttp://purl.uniprot.org/core/Journal_Citation
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"

Objective

To compare outcomes, specifically development of preeclampsia with severe features (sPE), between angiogenic biomarker-based admission and admission based on routine clinical care.

Study design

This secondary analysis of a prospective study evaluated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio in women presenting to triage for preeclampsia evaluation. Biomarkers levels were measured in samples collected from triage and analyzed retrospectively after outcomes were achieved. For this analysis patients would be hypothetically assigned to 'discharged' with a sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤ 38 and 'admitted' with a sFlt1/PlGF ratio > 85. Development of sPE and other outcomes were then compared using the biomarker and clinical criteria for admission.

Results

459 patients were included in this analysis. Using biomarker criteria, a larger proportion of patients were hypothetically discharged (67.8% vs 51.0%, p < 0.0001). A larger proportion of patients 'admitted' with a high biomarker level developed sPE (69.5% vs 40.9%, p < 0.0001). A sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤ 38 had a negative predictive value of 96.8% for development of sPE within two weeks.

Conclusion

Assessment of angiogenic biomarkes that 'discharges' patients with a low sFlt1/PlGF ratio and 'admits' patients with high ratio could result in reduced admissions and increased admission of patients at risk for developing sPE. Randomized trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of angiogenic biomarker use in decision making in a triage setting among women with suspected preeclampsia."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.org/dc/terms/identifier"doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2020.05.013"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Mueller A."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Suresh S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Salahuddin S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Rana S."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Dhir R."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/author"Naseem H."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/date"2020"xsd:gYear
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/name"Pregnancy Hypertens"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/pages"124-131"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/title"Evaluation of angiogenic factors in the decision to admit women with suspected preeclampsia."xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://purl.uniprot.org/core/volume"21"xsd:string
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#exactMatchhttp://purl.uniprot.org/pubmed/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopicOfhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_H9N1E7-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_H9N1E8-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B5A924-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_B1AC84-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_Q53XY6-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_G3XA84-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P17948-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_L7RSL3-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
http://purl.uniprot.org/uniprot/#_P49763-mappedCitation-32505096http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#objecthttp://purl.uniprot.org/citations/32505096
▶